|
not very consistent, as well as a certain
color-range. The Frankfort rose had reached England and perhaps America. R.
gallica had produced the Velvet rose, single and double.
There were others, but these are enough to show
that already new forms had appeared and roses were attracting attention. The
Malmaison collection awakened a sudden popularity for the rose which was in
itself a demand for more and more kinds of roses. Garden groups were mixed
together; results came rapidly, and new varieties were speedily spread abroad.
In old gardens, here, dating back to those years, these hybrids are met. They
seem to outnumber the surviving type forms and the earliest variations. That is
not difficult to understand. The first fifty years of the last century were
years of great expansion. These surviving
hybrids present problems in identification because, they display in their
physical features that they are partly one kind and partly another, or even two
others. And so they are. Rarely, however, are they lacking a dominating set of
features. The problem is to work out what kind dominates, and by this dominance
of a kind to classify. Often there shows up some outstanding characteristic
such as velvety petals, peculiar shadings, stripes, picotee edges, waxy petals,
definite or unusual fragrance, great neatness of petal arrangement, or a marked
irregularity, as in old Cinnamon rose. There might be an excess of prickles or
an absence of them, as in the Boursault roses. Moss on a Moss rose may be
reddish or brownish instead of green, or lacking glands, the moss may have the
form of crests of bristles as in R. centifolia cristata. Foliage may
have a distinguishing color, may have or not have pubescence, may have a matty
or a glistening surface. Such details are aids.
Very few records exist of roses used to create
new varieties, and these cannot always be assured. I remember reading in some
old book that the breeder recognized that even though he deliberately put the
pollen of one rose upon the stigma of another, his results might be influenced
by some other impregnating factor. Recourse in solving the problem is to the
plant itself, and this is not a new idea. A hundred years ago nurserymen who
grew roses for the trade and classified their hybrids for their catalogues had
to do what we try to do. Fortunately, we have, as they had, the early forms of
old garden species to |
|